On 03/21/2012 11:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
Daniel,

On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
The changes are code cleanup and does not change the behavior of the
driver itself.

A couple a things call my intention. Why the cpuidle device is set for cpu0 only
and why the WFI is not used ?

Daniel Lezcano (7):
   ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Remove unused valid field
   ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Declare the states with the driver declaration
   ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Remove the cpuidle_params_table table
   ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - fix static omap4_idle_data declaration
   ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Initialize omap4_idle_data at compile time
   ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - use the omap4_idle_data variable directly
   ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - remove omap4_idle_data initialization at boot
     time

The series looks fine to me in general. This clean-up is applicable
for OMAP3 cpuidle code as well.

Yes, I am planning to do the same for omap3.

Thanks for reviewing.

  -- Daniel

I want Jean to look at this series because some of his earlier
clean up has introduced those custom functions which
are getting removed in this series.

Regards
santosh




--
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to