Hi Rob, Robert Lee <rob....@linaro.org> writes:
> This patch series moves various functionality duplicated in platform > cpuidle drivers to the core cpuidle driver. Also, the platform irq > disabling was removed as it appears that all calls into > cpuidle_call_idle will have already called local_irq_disable(). > > These changes have been pulled into linux-next. > > Len, Andrew, can a request be made for Linus to pull these changes? > > Acked-by: Jean Pihet<j-pi...@ti.com> (v6) > Tested-by: Jean Pihet<j-pi...@ti.com> (v6, omap3) > Tested-by: Amit Daniel<amit.kach...@linaro.org> (v6, Exynos4) > Tested-by: Robert Lee<rob....@linaro.org> (imx51, imx6q) Note that there's a space missing between the name and email in these tags (and for Deepthi's below also.) That seems to exist in all the patches. > Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khil...@ti.com> For my Reviewed-by, it only applies to the core code and the OMAP changes. I haven't reviewed the other platform-specific drivers. I believe the same applies to Jean Pihet who works with me on OMAP. > Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org> > Reviewed-by: Deepthi Dharwar<deep...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (core cpuidle only) Looks like you never heard from anyone actively working on at91, shmobile, kirwood or davinci. I'm not sure we should merge those platform-specific changes without an ack from those platform maintainers. For 3.4, maybe we should just merge the core code and the platforms that have been reviewed/ack'd, and for 3.5, spent some time nagging the other platform maintainers to review and test. Kevin _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
