On 9 February 2012 09:21, Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 February 2012 18:35:28 Doug Anderson wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > On Thursday 02 February 2012 04:11:27 Chander Kashyap wrote:
>> > > +int main(int argc, char **argv)
>> > > +{
>> > > ...
>> > > + unsigned char buffer[BUFSIZE] = {0};
>> >
>> > this is an implicit memset() and from what i can see in the code,
>> > useless. you read() the entire buffer, so there's no need to initialize
>> > it.
>>
>> Funny, I was just about to submit a patch to add this = {0} myself when I
>> found this message. ;) I would say that it (or a memset, whichever people
>> prefer) is a good idea so that this tool can be used to make a reasonable
>> SPL out of any source binary executable, even ones that are smaller than
>> 14K.
>
> you're right ... i'll claim that i was deceived by the lack of input checking.
> sounds like the code should be aborting if the input is too large instead of
> silently truncating. then the memset/{0} is unnecessary:
> - write out the data read
> - lseek to the checksum position
> - write checksum
> - ftruncate to total length (16KiB?)
BUFSIZE is already made 14K, so no need to ftruncate.
> -mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> Samsung mailing list
> sams...@lists.linaro.org
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/samsung
>
--
with warm regards,
Chander Kashyap
_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
