Hello,

I'm Grégoire Gentil, the founder of Always Innovating. I intend to
participate to Linaro Connect Q1.12 though I'm not part of this
organization. I follow the work of Linaro and I find it very interesting
for our OMAP-based products such as the HDMI Dongle:
http://www.alwaysinnovating.com.

I don't know if it's the right forum or if such discussion has already
taken place, but there is one point that I would like to raise up:
release frequency. Linaro is currently on a one-month period, which is
very tight. To my mind, such small period presents two disadvantages,
long-term perspective and innovation:

- if there is a new release every month, it's hard to know which release
is *very* stable and should be used by an external company which might
not have the same frenzy to update all the time.

- Regarding innovation, Linaro might learn from the Ubuntu experience.
Mark Shuttleworth was a strong advocate of the strict Ubuntu short
release schedule and he admitted later that a too frequent period
prevents from innovating. When you are pressed by a schedule, it's hard
for the organization to step back and take the time to break-through on
a novel approach.

The point of my email is not to convince Linaro to change the current
situation but to bring an idea for a complementary approach at least for
the first point:

for instance, let's imagine a Linaro "super-stable once sometimes"
release. Right now, people are desperately looking for a "good" ICS
image - read Pandaboard groups if you are not convinced -, and ICS won't
change that much during the year. Perhaps there will be a 4.1 but when
you are doing a commercial product, you don't need the latest of the
latest and you certainly don't want to change your build process every
month. If there was a "good" ICS release today, I think that it would be
a major blockbuster for a lot of companies following Linaro. I'm
mentioning the Android example because it's what people want today, but
tomorrow it might be Meego or whatever. I'm not saying to stick to
Google schedule, it's just an example of what is trendy today and would
deserve long-term stable bits.

To go one step beyond in my thinking, I'm not advocating for a new
separate *strict* longer schedule. The idea might be more to have *A*
milestone release from time-to-time, after something major is out
(Android release, new ARM cortex), and Linaro decides that this next
monthly release should be a major one, very polished, very stable and
it's properly supported and advertised with clear wiki and updates for
security or critical problems.

The point of my email was not to criticize the very interesting work of
Linaro but to give an external point of view. Let me know if Linaro has
already done some thoughts about this topic, and if such discussion can
occur formally or informally at the coming Connect event.

Best regards,

Grégoire Gentil
Founder Always Innovating
http://www.alwaysinnovating.com


On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 18:28 +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: 
> Hi
> 
> I am arriving on Saturday evening and wondered what to do on Sunday. 
> Usually I spent time going to shops to buy some electronics but this 
> time I think that will leave it for Amazon instead.
> 
> That leaves me Sunday for sightseeing. According to Google Maps trip to 
> Golden Gate bridge takes 2.5h by public transport or 40 minutes by car. 
> But looks like there is no car rental in hotel ;(
> 
> Is anyone interested in going for some tour? I think that San Francisco 
> has some nice places to view.




_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to