On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 04:05:51 +0100, Zygmunt Krynicki <zygmunt.kryni...@linaro.org> wrote: > W dniu 08.12.2011 02:22, Michael Hudson-Doyle pisze: > > On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 17:01:25 +0100, Zygmunt > > Krynicki<zygmunt.kryni...@linaro.org> wrote: > >> Hi, sorry for the topic, I wanted to catch your attention. > >> > >> This is a quick brain dump based on my own observations/battle with > >> master images last week. > >> > > > >> 2) Running code via serial on the master image is a mess. It is very > >> fragile. > > > > Is it really? It's a bit of a pain, but it seems this part actually > > works ok for us. It also has the advantage that all the logs are in one > > place. > > <<CONMUX DISCONNECTED>>
Well, that's conmux being stupid. I agree with you (even if others don't) that at least looking at not using conmux would make sense. I think this might be as simple as including a command to run in the device config file such as "cu -l /dev/ttyUSB0 -s 115200" or "telnet 192.168.1.11 7003" (and a command to run to power cycle the board) and passing that to pexpect rather than "conmux-console $board". Let's talk about the other stuff in January :-) Cheers, mwh _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
