-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/01/2011 03:07 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > On 30 November 2011 13:34, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 11/30/2011 08:56 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote: >>>> On 30 November 2011 11:41, Amit Kucheria <amit.kuche...@linaro.org> wrote: >>>>> Wow - quite a cc-list :) >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Zach Pfeffer <zach.pfef...@linaro.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Amit/Mounir, >>>>>> >>>>>> What's your guys plan with cpu_idle for each board? Are you going to >>>>>> try and upstream a solution that will work across all boards? Would >>>>>> you or Mounir be open to filing a BP per board so we can track when >>>>>> cpu_idle will hit each board? Does it make sense to prototype >>>>>> something across each board that we could land in Ubuntu and Android? >>>>>> >>>>>> Adding other people, leads, etc... >>>>> >>>>> I'll add four more. >>>>> >>>>> The people I've added to cc are the ones looking at upstreaming >>>>> cpuidle for the various member platforms (the first 3 are Linaro >>>>> assignees): >>>>> >>>>> Samsung - Amit Kachhap >>>>> ST-E - Daniel Lezcano >>>>> Freescale - Rob Lee >>>>> TI - Kevin Hilman and Santosh Shilimkar >>>>> >>>>> Rob tried to upstream a driver for the imx5 platform. Russell >>>>> suggested that it is time to have a common cpuidle stub driver for >>>>> ARM[1]. >>>>> >>>>> Daniel Lezcano and Rob are currently working on such a common stub >>>>> driver. The imx5 cpuidle will get rebased on top of that. Daniel has >>>>> actively started work on a u8500 cpuidle driver in the meanwhile but >>>>> is awaiting documentation. >>>>> >>>>> For OMAP4, I was told that there was now a cpuidle driver on its way >>>>> into mainline. But I didn't find one after a cursory glance at the >>>>> lists. Perhaps Kevin/Santosh can shed some light there. The last known >>>>> tree I was aware of for an OMAP4 cpuidle driver was TI maintained >>>>> one[2]. >>>>> >>>>> For exynos, there is a basic cpuidle driver in mainline. Amit Kachhap >>>>> has been working on enhancing it[3] (adding more states and using more >>>>> of the common code that was recently added). >>>>> >>>>> In summary, we should have cpuidle working on the member platforms in >>>>> the coming month. If you want something today, you should look at >>>>> enabling OMAP4 and Exynos cpuidle configs. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Amit >>>> >>>> Cool, thanks for the overview Amit. >>>> >>>> Is there a test that a QA guy can run to verify that cpu_idle is >>>> working? A set of commands and a proc node to cat out with some stats >>>> perhaps? > > This is something we are working on [1]. The test suite [2] has a few > trivial tests but we want to add more tests, so it is is in the radar. > >> Would you share a pointer to the source?
Do you mean the source of the pm-qa code ? > The test suite is integrated in LAVA and is run daily. The LAVA script > checkout the head git tree and run automatically the tests. Each time we > commit a new tests, it is take into account and run in LAVA. > > For the moment, all the PM features are not available for all the > boards, so most of the tests fail and the results are not very > significant but the more we will merge the different PM blocks upstream, > the greener the test suite will be :) > > [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-power-qa/+spec/qa-cpuidle > [2] http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/dlezcano/pm-qa.git;a=summary > > >>>>> p.s Andy, was the breakage you reported in cpuidle related to the >>>>> missing export.h patch? >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/132859/focus=133279 >>>>> [2] git://gitorious.org/omap-sw-develoment/linux-omap-dev.git >>>>> for_3_2/omap4_mpuss_pm-integrated_2 >>>>> [3] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/7877 >>>> >>>> >>>> > > - -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO14r0AAoJEAKBbMCpUGYA7dUIAK8ghea5S1BKIX3d6eMdSJqw fFBjzMFUSosDJTS2Chy19PPRGx80MDlXRZ1qHdQlcgU0IVJNlkoDm01/j2vha6H3 v8470SSTvqRSDHQuYC26S8/8mREdspgwDCQxpKCcAernX5Tqpqql069cK/tDb24W vpeWncwAuIWcU3N/f2/WisYVFjr5gKReXw/1slP4Mjmq4Gl2u1KrdhXF941mORTA by5ipmPEUfwL+NPRK35s0qnd5Kf/s+IRK6riSv904hDe0xrOpWdSF9f9aRok+iTo UdfUJfN1E/ivIm08XM2/QubdB//iR7i6Wym76ttwysQ1QsLcSKDXFcvVva/iJ3U= =g3SN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
