On 22 November 2011 12:22, Mans Rullgard <mans.rullg...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 22 November 2011 10:30, Andy Green <andy.gr...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 11/22/2011 10:45 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard<mans.rullg...@linaro.org> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig | 3 --- >>> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig >>> index fe18e27..427d27b 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig >>> @@ -44,9 +44,6 @@ config ARCH_OMAP4 >>> select CPU_V7 >>> select ARM_GIC >>> select LOCAL_TIMERS if SMP >>> - select PL310_ERRATA_588369 >>> - select PL310_ERRATA_727915 >>> - select ARM_ERRATA_720789 >>> select ARCH_HAS_OPP >>> select PM_OPP if PM >>> select USB_ARCH_HAS_EHCI >> >> Mans thanks for bringing these to my attention. >> >> From what I can figure out from Santosh's comments I want the two PL310 >> patches. I already had my own patch for limiting 4460 ES1.0 cache >> workaround to that revision, although I'll happily deprecate it when yours >> turns up in mainline. > > Mainline has nothing at all for this, nor does linux-omap. > >> For this particular patch although it's fixed in 4460 CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4 is >> also there for 4430. Am I right to take from your patch name we do need >> these workarounds on 4430? > > Yes, the workarounds are needed on 4430.
Correction, 588369 is not needed on 4430 ES2.x. It was fixed in PL310 r2p0 which is used there. I can't find a TRM for ES1.x so can't check the PL310 version it uses (don't have a device either). -- Mans Rullgard / mru _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
