Hi Nicolas, As suggested by you, I have cherry picked the necessary patches from rmk-next tree and applied it on top of latest linaro tree.
Please pull them for next linaro release. The pull path is, git://git.linaro.org/people/amitdanielk/linux.git samsung_cpuidle_l2_retention. All the patches are tested and there details are, Amit Daniel Kachhap (3): ARM: EXYNOS4: Add support AFTR mode on EXYNOS4210 ARM: EXYNOS4: Added function to read chip id ARM: exynos4: add L2 early resume code Barry Song (3): ARM: 7089/1: L2X0: add explicit cpu_relax() for busy wait loop ARM: 7090/1: CACHE-L2X0: filter start address can be 0 and is often 0 ARM: 7114/1: cache-l2x0: add resume entry for l2 in secure mode Lorenzo Pieralisi (2): ARM: exynos4: remove useless churn in sleep.S ARM: exynos4: remove useless code to save/restore L2 and GIC state Rob Herring (1): ARM: 7009/1: l2x0: Add OF based initialization Shawn Guo (1): ARM: 7100/1: smp_scu: remove __init annotation from scu_enable() Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/l2cc.txt | 42 +++++ arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/cache-l2x0.h | 42 +++++ arch/arm/include/asm/outercache.h | 7 + arch/arm/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 12 ++ arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c | 2 +- arch/arm/mach-exynos4/cpu.c | 47 +++++- arch/arm/mach-exynos4/cpuidle.c | 151 ++++++++++++++++- arch/arm/mach-exynos4/include/mach/pmu.h | 2 + arch/arm/mach-exynos4/platsmp.c | 7 +- arch/arm/mach-exynos4/pm.c | 87 ---------- arch/arm/mach-exynos4/sleep.S | 29 +++- arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c | 216 +++++++++++++++++++++++- arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/exynos4.h | 1 + Thanks, Amit Daniel On 21 October 2011 02:19, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pi...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Amit Kachhap wrote: > >> Hi Nicolas, >> >> This is a request to pull L2 retention cpuidle implementation from >> git://git.linaro.org/people/amitdanielk/linux.git (branch- >> samsung_cpuidle_l2_retention) >> >> The top 5 patches on this refers to the work and this is heavily based >> on Russell's rmk-next tree. So if it is possible to take this patches >> for this month linaro release then please pull them. > > The Linaro kernel for this month was frozen today already. > > Still, I was ready to pull those patches if they were trivial. But they > are based on RMK's for-next branch which is _not_ a stable branch, > therefore I'm for sure not willing to pull all his for-next branch into > the linaro repository, and even less so on the Linaro kernel freeze > deadline. > > If you want those patches available in the Linaro kernel (maybe for next > month's release) I'd ask you to cherry-pick the required patches and > apply them to a branch which is based on the current state of the > linux-linaro-3.1 repository, and please test the resulting branch. > > > Nicolas > _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
