Tushar Behera wrote:
>
> Dear Wolfgang Denk,
>
> On Thursday 15 September 2011 02:44 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Tushar Behera,
> >
> > In message<1316076867-2138-1-git-send-email-tushar.beh...@linaro.org>
you
> wrote:
> >> ORIGEN board is fitted with 7" LCD panel HV070WSA. The pixel
> >> resolution of the LCD panel is 1024x600.
> > ...
> >> +static struct s3c_fb_pd_win origen_fb_win0 = {
> >> + .win_mode = {
> >> + .left_margin = 64,
> >> + .right_margin = 16,
> >> + .upper_margin = 64,
> >> + .lower_margin = 16,
> >> + .hsync_len = 48,
> >> + .vsync_len = 3,
> >> + .xres = 1024,
> >> + .yres = 600,
> >> + },
> >> + .max_bpp = 32,
> >> + .default_bpp = 24,
> >> +};
> >
> > Does it still make sense to hard-code such parameters?
> >
> > In PowerPC-land we pass display mode information in the device tree
> > using a verbatim EDID block.
> >
> > Would it be not better (and way more flexible) to do the same here,
> > now that ARM has device tree support?
> >
> Thanks for your suggestions.
>
> Currently work for enabling device tree support for EXYNOS4 based
> machine is going on. Once it is done, we should be able to pass this
> information through device tree blob.
>
> For non-DT machines, IMHO, we have to follow the current approach.
OK, applied.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene....@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
