On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 09:18:53PM +0800, Jim Huang wrote: > 2011/9/3 Christian Robottom Reis <k...@linaro.org>: > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:24:59AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > >> I'd like you to meet Jim who did the initial hardfloat work. This > >> email contains the results that Jim produced. > > > > Hmm, but the email seems to not actually contain a hard-float run. Or am > > I misreading what he means by Fixed vs VFP? > > hi kiko, > > In fact, the presentation was incomplete. That is exactly the reason > why I didn't want to make it public. > > The original plans were as following: > - Analyze skia and webkit for soft/hard-fp > - Select fixed-point, soft-vfp, and hard-fp implementations in skia > and then check the benchmark results. > > However, I didn't make all benchmark results ready when I built with > hard-fp. I didn't know why and stopped the study due to personal > reasons. (sorry for being absent)
That's fine -- I was just curious as to whether I was misunderstanding the data in your findings. If you have time to update it so we can tell the different build configuration used in each case (and if you can do separate runs just swapping between ABIs) then I'd like to take a deeper look into it. -- Christian Robottom Reis, Engineering VP Brazil (GMT-3) | [+55] 16 9112 6430 | [+1] 612 216 4935 Linaro.org: Open Source Software for ARM SoCs _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
