Now that we have an Android build for every board and Gerrit and LAVA
I'd like to unify how we handle kernels for each so that we can work
more efficiently, start to unify the kernels and provide a means for
external Android users to start to improve these trees.

First, since we control the kernels that go into our Android builds
I'd like to follow AOSP convention and have:

kernel/common.git (john's tree)
kernel/imx53.git
kernel/omap.git
kernel/origen.git
kernel/snowball.git

(right now we have:

panda, beagle
<remote name="linaro-other" fetch="git://git.linaro.org/"/>
<project path="kernel" name="people/jstultz/android"
revision="linaro-android-3.0" remote="linaro-other"/>

panda-leb
<remote name="linaro-other" fetch="git://git.linaro.org/"/>
<project path="kernel" name="people/andygreen/kernel-tilt"
revision="tilt-jstultz-linaro-android-3.0" remote="linaro-other"/>

leb-snowball
<remote name="linaro-other" fetch="git://git.linaro.org/"/>
<project path="kernel" name="bsp/st-ericsson/linux-3.0-android-ux500"
revision="master" remote="linaro-other"/>

leb-origen
<remote name="linaro-other" fetch="git://git.linaro.org/"/>
<project path="kernel" name="people/angus/linux-linaro-3.0"
remote="linaro-other" revision="android"/>

leb-imx53
<remote fetch="git://git.linaro.org/" name="linaro-other"/>
<project name="people/bernhardrosenkranzer/android-kernel-iMX53"
path="kernel" remote="linaro-other"
revision="3d981d9418c53e3e1a079582088121c641588791"/>
)

I'd like these to be at git://android.git.linaro.org/. I'd like to not mirror.

Each tree would accept patches via Gerrit and be maintainable through
standard git by the tree maintainers. This should allow upgrades to
each, without needing to push all the upgrade patches through Gerrit.

Next, we'd like to point to a tip branch for each of these trees. This
branch would be were development would be happening. Tracking tip is
fundamental to continuous integration, if its broken then the primary
job of everyone should be getting it going again. I'd like to suggest
the branches be named the same and follow John's branch naming
convention:

linaro-android-3.0...etc

Lastly, I'd like to request (and we may be able to automate this once
all the kernels are co-located) that once a pinned-manifest.xml comes
out, referencing a specific sha1, I'd like to lay a tag on that sha so
it sticks around. Its better to tag after the fact because it saves
having to do another build/test/qa cycle and will ensure that our
pinned-manifest.xml continue to work.

I suspect a few growing pains, but I think this is going to be great.
Once the kernels are co-located we should be able to look at Gerrit
extensions that allow easier upstream patch submission and tracking.
We should also be able to more easily refactor things. Using the
Gerrit flow and extending it to support Android upstreaming is exactly
the thing Linaro was built for. Since Gerrit is such an integral part
of Android development, extensions to allow patch propagation would
allow a lot of the good work to flow back into the mainline kernel.

-Zach

_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to