On 16 August 2011 20:02, Zach Pfeffer <zach.pfef...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 15 August 2011 03:19, Paul Sokolovsky <paul.sokolov...@linaro.org> wrote: >> Hello Zach, >> >> On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 10:10:57 -0500 >> Zach Pfeffer <zach.pfef...@linaro.org> wrote: >> >>> Paul, >>> >>> I'd like to just save all toolchain builds from here on. Copying >>> builds to "good locations" just wastes time since we have to redo the >>> builds. Will it be possible to save these and the release builds? >> >> If you mean "make sure they that official toolchain builds don't >> expire and not being garbage-collected, like we had lately" - then yes, >> sure, I fixed those builds and will keep that in mind. Actually, I'd >> like to do changes to Android-build frontend to enforce policies >> regarding official builds. For example, automatically turn off >> expiration when creating an official build (template job still >> should have expiration by default, or personal builds will overflow >> any disk space allocated for builds), or allow to execute official >> builds only by official builders >> (https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823887). > > Yeah, I think we should just keep all offical builds. Then we don't > have to copy over to releases or snapshot and can just reference the > builds from android build and put all tthe info about the build on the > page that hosts the build. Then everything will be in one place.
We produce downloads metric from releases/snapshots.linaro.org data. If we don't ship the official builds from these hosts, what's your plan about the metric? > What do you think asac, if we just save all official builds then we > can save the copy over step. _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev