On 16 August 2011 20:02, Zach Pfeffer <zach.pfef...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 15 August 2011 03:19, Paul Sokolovsky <paul.sokolov...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Hello Zach,
>>
>> On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 10:10:57 -0500
>> Zach Pfeffer <zach.pfef...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Paul,
>>>
>>> I'd like to just save all toolchain builds from here on. Copying
>>> builds to "good locations" just wastes time since we have to redo the
>>> builds. Will it be possible to save these and the release builds?
>>
>> If you mean "make sure they that official toolchain builds don't
>> expire and not being garbage-collected, like we had lately" - then yes,
>> sure, I fixed those builds and will keep that in mind. Actually, I'd
>> like to do changes to Android-build frontend to enforce policies
>> regarding official builds. For example, automatically turn off
>> expiration when creating an official build (template job still
>> should have expiration by default, or personal builds will overflow
>> any disk space allocated for builds), or allow to execute official
>> builds only by official builders
>> (https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823887).
>
> Yeah, I think we should just keep all offical builds. Then we don't
> have to copy over to releases or snapshot and can just reference the
> builds from android build and put all tthe info about the build on the
> page that hosts the build. Then everything will be in one place.

We produce downloads metric from releases/snapshots.linaro.org data.
If we don't ship the official builds from these hosts, what's your
plan about the metric?

> What do you think asac, if we just save all official builds then we
> can save the copy over step.

_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to