On Tuesday 05 July 2011, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> DA9053 chip submission was done by Linaro and now they have agreed that
> we will be only responsible for DA9053 submission too so now we can
> skip the posted DA9053 patch.
Ok.
> Regarding file naming convention da9052 seems to be appropriate since
> DA9053 chip is update of DA9052 and also DA9052 is the umbrella name
> for the whole family.
What about the existing da903x drivers for leds, touchscreen, battery,
regulator and backlight? Are they all completely distinct from the
da905x line?
Arnd
_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
