On 26 May 2011 11:56, Alexander Sack <a...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Dave Martin <dave.mar...@linaro.org> wrote: >> People do expect releases.linaro.org to be an archive of old releases, as >> well as a repository of new releases. >> >> Can I ask that the URIs of all components of old releases should continue >> to work (i.e., we either don't move that stuff ever, or we provide >> aliases)? >> >> I've had complaints from people that their old scripts, or their attempts >> to reproduce old releases were broken by the most recent rearrangement. > > Yes, this was a one time mistake (oversight) and we reverted that > change quickly afterwards. All changes we do here should have proper > redirects etc. in place to keep the old URLs working
1. My vote is to leave the layout as it is for what is up (so we don't break anything) 2. I don't care about the layout for future releases, provided I can index it using simple rules. 3. Once I have finished the TestDrive GUI, see if we can use the same principles to create a simple to use web page, that doesn't expose the storage file system. We should be able to query the server with a board type and some data about what release/shapshot you want and be provided with a download page with both the hardware pack and the OS image to download (and probably with a linaro-media-create line as well). I am sure this could be refined so that a page could be prodded by a user or script to return a tar ball of both (gzipped inside). -- James Tunnicliffe _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
