David Gilbert <david.gilb...@linaro.org> writes: >> The memcpy case is not interesting. Not at all. Most kernel memcpy >> calls are for small size copies. The large copy instances are just bad >> and misdesigned in the first place if they rely on memcpy (maybe they >> should simply have a custom copy function, maybe implemented with Neon). > > Even outside the kernel vast memcpy's are fairly rare as far as I can > tell - everyone knows they're going to hurt so people try and avoid > them;
If only that were true. I have long since lost count of the times I have (in vain) told people to lose the mempcys in order to improve performance. -- Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
