Re'adding linaro-dev

On 11 Mar 25, Yong Shen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Amit Kucheria 
> <amit.kuche...@linaro.org>wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Yong Shen <yong.s...@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Daniel,
> > > Yes. I had started the work for several days.
> > > Previously, every time when clock info is refreshed, the data structure
> > will
> > > be reallocated as if it is the first time of building up clock info. The
> > > goal is only allocating memory once, which means less system call made by
> > > malloc and also reducing potential memory fragment.
> > > I am coding and debuging right now, hoping it comes out soon.
> > > Yong
> >
> > So as to avoid the (inevitable) conflicts, may I propose that I first
> > apply Yong's patch sent last week to add inotify support. It is not a
> > very invasive patch.
> >
> No, Amit, no need apply the patch I post last time. It will be involved in
> my coming patch(s)

Ahh, ok. I was just about to start fixing up your patch to apply after
Daniel's changes.
> >
> > Yong, for the mem allocation work, perhaps it is best if we wait for
> > Daniel to send his latest series and work on top of that.
> >
> No problem for me.

Alright. So let's wait a day or so for Daniel to post his series and review
it.

/Amit

_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to