Ack, we discussed this today in android meeting and will take your patches to a special toolchain branch that allows us to experiement with 4.5/4.6 toolchain while not hiding the underlying problems. Thanks for your work!
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Sachin Kamat <sachin.ka...@linaro.org> wrote: > Hi Arnd, Alexander, > > Some of the work arounds are just make shift solutions so that those > dependent on the build can carry on with their work. > Meanwhile as you guys said, the underlying problem needs to be addressed and > fixed. This might take a while. > > Regards > Sachin > > On 16 March 2011 17:17, Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote: >> >> On Wednesday 16 March 2011, Sachin Kamat wrote: >> > --- a/elfcopy.c >> > +++ b/elfcopy.c >> > @@ -2456,7 +2456,6 @@ update_symbol_values(Elf *elf, GElf_Ehdr *ehdr, >> > out why and also figure out whether the zero >> > value should have >> > been adjusted, after all. >> > */ >> > - ASSERT(!(shdr_info[sym->st_shndx].shdr.sh_flags >> > & SHF_ALLOC)); >> > ASSERT(shdr_info[i].shdr.sh_type == >> > SHT_SYMTAB); >> > } >> >> Like the -Werror changes that Alexander commented on, this change >> circumvents the error output, but does not address the underlying >> problem. If you remove an assertion, that at least needs a very >> good explanation why the assertion was incorrect in the first >> place. >> >> Arnd > > > > -- > With warm regards, > Sachin > -- - Alexander _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
