On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Patrik Ryd <patrik....@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 15 March 2011 12:28, Alexander Sack <a...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> would be great to have a more verbose git comment as of why we are
>> doing this. e.g. what was the problem and what was the solution. also
>> why do we need to have a copy of mktarball.sh rather than fixing that
>> one directly.
>
> This patch fixes the permission problem in our root tarball. I think we
> should try come
> to a conclusion on how we are going to handle the kernel for the different
> builds first
> and then start building the boot tarball instead of our root tarball.

I agree. Let's get our boottarball/kernel story sorted out this week.

I would like to see us being able to repo sync our various kernels and
use the android platform build system to build the kernel + the
boottarballs. In this way we can reuse our build service more or less
without modifications.

Anyway, until that happens, feel free to push this patch!

-- 

 - Alexander

_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to