The skia code is also hold in the chromium project. I used chromium web browser to check the skia performance with some browser benchmarks.
I think pixman is also a good candidate for skia to benchmark toolchain. Regards, Jammy On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Jim Huang <jim.hu...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 1 March 2011 10:45, Michael Hope <michael.h...@linaro.org> wrote: > [...] > > I'd like to use Skia as a toolchain benchmark but the upstream seems a > > bit messy. I'm using this export: > > http://people.linaro.org/~michaelh/skia-0~svn788.tar.xz > > hi Michael, > > Thanks for your interest! > > > from http://code.google.com/p/skia/ which I then build and run using > > these rules: > > > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~linaro-toolchain-dev/cbuild/trunk/view/head:/lib/skiabench.mk > > > > The code.google version seems a bit broken. autoconf scripts are > > included but they don't work. The non-autoconf Makefile assumes Intel > > with SSE2. The Android Skia seems to be a fork from some time ago and > > uses build scripts that are tightly tied into the Android build > > system. > > Yes, don't use autotool inside skia package. > > > What's the best version to use? I'd like to standardise across Linaro > > for benchmarking so that results can be compared across groups, or at > > least so we don't get confused. > > The skia maintainer, Mike Reed, made two branches: one is hosted in > Google Code, and another is > inside Android source tree: > http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/external/skia.git;a=summary > > I would suggest to use the later. > > Also, here is my previous testing results: > > http://groups.google.com/group/0xlab-devel/browse_thread/thread/f76d8af5b01b2edc > > Sincerely, > -jserv > > _______________________________________________ > linaro-dev mailing list > linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev >
_______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
