On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Christian Robottom Reis
<k...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 05:02:41PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
>> Do we need a policy on whether or not to use Bcc here?
>>
>> One argument for using Bcc is that it avoids replies from subscribers
>> to the destination mailing lists from also being CC'd to
>> patc...@linaro.org.  Can your analysis cope with patc...@linaro.org
>> receiving a whole thread, or do we need to be careful about this?
>
> Use CC, not BCC.
>
> There is no issue with people replying to patc...@linaro.org; we will
> use the headers to ensure we're not double-counting, and having the
> whole thread actually helps us hint if the patches were upstreamed or
> not.

OK-- if you're confident that the analysis won't break, and that no
bounces will come from patches@linaro, then I agree -- there's no
other reason for the CC to be "secret"

Cheers
---Dave

_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to