I also noticed that default XRandR1.2+ implementation is missing in X side. If we can implement one, it would be beneficial for all ARM platforms. By the way, does X driver of TI support XRandR1.2+?
Regards, Jammy On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Clark, Rob <r...@ti.com> wrote: > Hmm, I was thinking more on the xf86 side of things.. ie. to provide > default implementations of xf86CrtcFuncsRec and xf86OutputFuncsRec > functions.. > > BR, > -R > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Jammy Zhou <jammy.z...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > There is already one KMS abstraction layer (libkms.so) in libdrm, maybe > it can serve as what we needed. > > > > Regards, > > Jammy > > > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Clark, Rob <r...@ti.com> wrote: > >> > >> I'm still in the learning-as-I-go phase here, so definitely not ready > >> to propose a solution, but it does seem to me like there is room for > >> some sort of kms-helper library here to handle more of the boilerplate > >> xf86-video-* stuff.. I guess I'll have a better picture once I have a > >> chance to add support for the various multi-monitor configurations. > >> But certainly would be interested if anyone already has some ideas. > >> > >> BR, > >> -R > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Jesse Barker <jesse.bar...@linaro.org> > wrote: > >> > Speaking for the Linaro graphics working group, I think it's great. > And, I > >> > think you're right, that if enough of the KMS support in xf86-video-* > is > >> > similar enough (I was only aware of intel and nouveau supporting it > properly > >> > at current), pulling it out into a common layer would make it easier > to > >> > support in new drivers (including fbdev). > >> > > >> > cheers, > >> > Jesse > >> > > >> > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On Tuesday 15 February 2011, Clark, Rob wrote: > >> >> > I'd been experimenting a bit on the side w/ the DRM driver > framework ( > >> >> > > >> >> > > http://gitorious.com/~robclark/pandaboard/robclarks-kernel-omap4/commits/omap_gpu > >> >> > ), but had to add a good chunk of mostly boilerplate code to our > xorg > >> >> > driver in order just to test it. Maybe some generic support for > KMS > >> >> > in xf86-video-fbdev would have made this easier to develop the > kernel > >> >> > part without in parallel having to implement the userspace part. > I'm > >> >> > not sure if this is the sort of thing the linaro-wg has in mind? > >> >> > >> >> I'm not sure what the the linaro multimedia wg thinks of this, but > the > >> >> kernel code you linked looks like it's doing exactly the right thing. > >> >> > >> >> Arnd > >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> linaro-dev mailing list > >> >> linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org > >> >> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev > >> > > >> > > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> linaro-dev mailing list > >> linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org > >> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev > > >
_______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
