Hi, Grant,

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Grant Likely <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca> wrote:
>
> On Jan 27, 2011 4:07 AM, "Liu Hui-R64343" <r64...@freescale.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pi...@linaro.org>
>> >wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Grant Likely wrote:
>> >>
>> >Done.  My branch is based on 2.6.38-rc1, so I cherry picked rather than
>> >rebased.  The first two commits are in Linus' tree, the remainder are
>> > from
>> >devicetree/arm. You can find the result here:
>> >
>> >The following changes since commit
>> >18fac29199a8cd9053adde99849c37dbf2a8b8d9:
>> >
>> >  regulators: Moved define for number of regulators in ab8500
>> >(2011-01-26 16:38:15 -0500)
>> >
>> >are available in the git repository at:
>> >  git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6 devicetree/arm-linaro-2.6.37
>>
>> It seems that this branch lack some patches which you summit to LKM, such
>> as
>> DT_MACHINE_START/DT_MACHINE_END definion etc.
>
> Correct. The devicetree/arm and devicetree/arm-linaro-2.6.37 branches only
> contain the bare minimum to turn on dt support.  I'm only putting stuff in
> those branches that I'm confident are pretty close to final form.  It
> doesn't have the clk stuff and it doesn't have the DT_MACHINE_START macro.
>
> DT_MACHINE_START is missing because I'm not sure whether or not it is
> necessary. Support for dt can be added to a regular MACHINE_START without
> the DT version simply by populating the dt_compat table.  It is no longer
> necessary to have a "magic" 0xffffffff dt machine number (but the machine
> number does need to still be valid, at least until 2.6.39).

Yes, make sense.

>
> You can find the patches I'm not decided on yet in my devicetree/test
> branch.  But be warned, that branch gets rebased.  The devicetree/arm branch
> does not.
>
>>
>> Which branch I need work on to add DT support for FSL i.MX support?
>
> You should still be able to use devicetree/arm

OK. Since there still be some fix to be pulled in, this branch should
be rebased timely.

BR,
Jason

>
> g.
>
>>
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >linaro-dev mailing list
>> >linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
>> >http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> linaro-dev mailing list
> linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
>
>

_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to