On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Scott Bambrough wrote: > On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 15:50 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > defconfig for s5pv310 was deliberately avoided by the maintainer > > > because of linus being unhappy with too many defconfigs. So for > > > s5pv310, the s5pv210_defconfig is used. > > > > As I'd prefer to use patches in the Linaro kernel tree which are as > > close as possible to upstream including proper authorship attributions, > > could you direct me to a git repo where I could find them? > > Alternatively, can you resend them to me? Extracting patches from > > mailing list archives is not practical. > > I'd like the landing team to be building this tree for you. Can you > work with Angus directly to ensure you get what you need.
Angus did send me a patch directly. For a small amount of trivial patches this is often the easiest solution. I requested that linaro-dev be CC'd for others to see. And then Thomas pointed out that the same patch was already accepted in the Samsung tree, and therefore I'd prefer cherry-picking that one instead. That's where we are now. I don't mind performing the cherry-pick myself. But I'd appreciate if landing teams (or anyone with the info handy) could do all the digging for commit IDs and repository URLs in that case. Nicolas _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
