On 10 Oct 07, Yong Shen wrote: > > > > +static struct cpufreq_frequency_table imx_freq_table[4]; > > > > Three frequencies should be enough for everyone, right? This should be > > dynamically allocated like in other cpufreq drivers. > > > > Yes, we only support 3 work points, which is for sure. Actually, we only > support 2 points on most mx51 chips. I supposed it is ok to use static array > here.
This can become a common cpufreq driver for all i.MX platforms. We don't know how many work points will be supported in future versions of the silicon. That is why a static array is not ok. I think Sascha was being ironic when he said "Three frequencies should be enough for everyone, right?" :) /Amit _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
