On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:23 AM, John Rigby <john.ri...@linaro.org> wrote: > Thanks Michael. Just wanted to make sure I understood. The "do no > harm" goal and the Thumb2 libgcc seem to be somewhat contradictory > however. I realize that choices need to be made and only odd ducks > like me will likely run into issues.
I'd like to use our toolchain on my N800 and Cortex-M3 boards as well. The 'do no harm' is at the source level - you should be able to take the Linaro GCC tarball and build a compiler for your particular situation that is as good as and probably more correct than the FSF GCC. Unfortunately we can't make one libgcc that covers all ARM products as some like the Cortex-M series are Thumb-2 only, some like the Cortex-M0 are Thumb-1 only, and some (very old ones) are ARM only. Then you add the floating point options into the mix. It would be nice to ship multiple builds of libgcc with the cross compiler but that's currently out of scope. -- Michael _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
