Hi all,
once again returning to this ever-hot topic ...
I'm going to release a library with LilyPond code, and I'm not
completely sure which license this should be done with:
My intentions are:
* Anybody should be able to *use* the library, that is \include it and
use its functions, even in commercial and closed-source environments
* Anybody should be allowed to modify the library code itself, but
this should be forced to be open source.
My impression is that the LGPL is created exactly for this purpose. Am I
right with that? Or not? If not, what would be a good alternative?
TIA
Urs
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
