Hi, On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 5:50 PM, David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 2:15 PM, David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Kieren, >> >> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Kieren MacMillan < >> kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote: >> >>> Hi David, >>> >>> > This situation with staccato dots is more complex, however. Gould >>> says: "Staccato dots and wedges by themselves look best centred on a stem >>> ... although many editions do centre them on the notehead" (118). >>> >>> Good point. >>> Perhaps it could/should be a parameter? >>> >>> >> Certainly. I've been thinking about this situation. The difficulty is >> that the X-offset of the staccato dot (Script) is set independently of the >> ScriptColumn, of which it has no knowledge (i.e., a pointer). This makes >> "position yourself this way unless there are simultaneous articulations" >> impossible at the moment. >> > > Looks like it's not a problem giving a Script a pointer to a ScriptColumn > grob. Will investigate if I can modify the X-offset callback for Script to > deal with the staccato situation. > > It's definitely possible! Using a pointer to a ScriptColumn, the X-offset callback for Script can be modified to (1) center staccatos over the stem if no other articulations are present; (2) center them over the note head if multiple articulations are present. I'll go over this some more, and if all goes well I should have a patch up for discussion. Best, David
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
