Hi all, thanks for the responses. Indeed the slashed grace is the wrong example
as the slashing is not supported for more than one note, which I agree is an
oversight as it is common in contemporary music.
However if you look at it with /grace, I mean that:
\grace {a32 a32}
should probably be the same as:
\grace {a32} \grace {a32}
The way I saw it was that two \grace expressions should render two grace notes
in a row since I did not get a warning at all, just a weird score.
I can adapt to this behavior of course.
Thanks again for your responses.
best,
J
On Jan 3, 2015, at 7:02 PM, Jaime E Oliver <jaime.oliv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am not sure if this is a bug, or just improper use, but, when using a
> single grace note expression with two notes such as:
> \slashedGrace {a'32 a32}
> I get the expected result.
>
> But when I use two subsequent ones such as:
> \slashedGrace {a'32} \slashedGrace {a32}
> I get the wrong score representation.
>
> I am assuming it is a bug as the software should be able to parse it. While
> it seems unusual for a human to write that, it would not be uncommon in
> computer generated material.
>
> Below is a testing code.
>
> All the best,
>
> Jaime
>
>
>
>
>
> \relative c'' {
>
> \time 4/4
>
> % example 1 correct
> a4 \slashedGrace {a'32 a32}
> d,4 d2
>
> % example 2 bug?
> a4 \slashedGrace {a'32} \slashedGrace {a32}
> d,4 d2
>
> }
>
> \version "2.18.2"
> % notes Pd External version: testing_0.01
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
