>>>>> "Br" == Br Samuel Springuel <rpspring...@gmail.com> writes:
Br> On 2014-12-21 12:20 AM, pe...@chubb.wattle.id.au wrote: >> As both cases have the same stem direction one has to be shifted. >> Usually if you want two voices you either give them separate >> staves, or give one the \voiceOne and the other the \voiceTwo >> appellations. Br> Ah! I didn't notice this because I'm reproducing a chant without Br> any note stems. Br> However, even after adding \voiceOne and \voiceTwo I'm still Br> seeing the double articulation. It's harder to see (because the Br> articulation on the lower note tends to collide with the higher Br> note) but it's still there (see first articulated note below in Br> voiced staff). Yes, articulations are per-voice --- otherwise you can't have a tenuto tenor against a staccato cantus or similar. Something like http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=372 might help. Or try removing the Script_engraver from one of the voices. But if you're never going to split the voices into staves, then it's easiest to add the articulation to only a single voice. Or if you really want to be able to merge the articulations, put them all in a single voice, using partcombine: %%% \version "2.18.2" \language "english" mel = {bflat'2 bflat'4-- a'-- a'--} harm = {g'2 g'4-- c'-- f'--} global = { \key f \major } \new Staff \with { \remove "Time_signature_engraver" } \partcombine {\global \mel } \harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
