2014-07-30 14:39 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: > Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Hi David, >> >> may I ask you to have a look? >> >> There's an optional argument failing with a single use-case and I've >> no clue why. >> Did I something wrong? >> >> (You may want to skip most of the mail and go to the REMARK) > > Optional argument declaration syntax conflicts with the use of anonymous > lambda functions. Actually, I would expect the main problem to be the > other way round: a lambda function used as a regular predicate gets > confused with an actual argument. But since anonymous functions don't > work with mandatory arguments, using them for optional arguments is not > likely a good idea either. > > At any rate, the example is far too complex to sensibly "have a look". > Can you reduce this to something smaller? > > -- > David Kastrup
Will try later. Now it's time for garden work. Thanks, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
