On 29 Jul 2014, at 21:16, Graham Breed <gbr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 29/07/14 15:18, Hans Aberg wrote: > >> Graham Breed wrote a file for equal temperaments for an earlier version of >> LilyPond, which I was able to tweak for the latest version (discussed on the >> devel list). When using the currently available microtonal symbols, then >> also key signatures seemed to work fine - a problem in the past. > > The latest code is here: https://bitbucket.org/x31eq/microlily > > I thought it was up to date. I can take patches if it isn’t. ... > With 2.16.0, everything works except the accidentals sometimes crash the > barlines.
The one I made works with LilyPond 2.19.10 - just tested. It may be different from the one you have. >> So it seems that all one has to do in order to get decent microtonality into >> LilyPond is to include this version of Graham’s file in the distribution and >> add microtonal symbols so that they can be called like the ones currently >> available. > > Sagittal works for accidentals as a text font. It should work for key > signatures as well, but I don't test that. At least in the past, I think that if one has not recompiled LilyPond for the font, key signatures won’t work. They do work with the built-in microtonal accidentals, though. > I didn't use a music font because it was too much trouble to create a music > font with Sagittal. Also, it's possible to use strings for chained > accidentals with a text font. This would be important for Extended Helmholtz > if anybody wired it up. This was one I had in mind. For those that do not know about these: it is basically a way to make sure that Just Intonation can be typeset; there is not enough of microtonal accidentals in the built-in set. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
