Hi Jan-Peter,
2014-07-29 9:34 GMT+02:00 Jan-Peter Voigt <jp.vo...@gmx.de>:
> Hi Janek,
>
> your predefined context are cool :)
Thanks!
> I see them in context with my lalily templates -- they will of course
> benifit. And the editionEngraver can indeed take advantage from specific
> context names. But still there need to be a way to separate (for
> example) violin 1 and 2.
As i said, defining new instrument contexts is very cheap - you can just do
\newInstrument "ViolinI" "Violin" "StaffGroup"\with { } \with { }
\newInstrument "ViolinII" "Violin" "StaffGroup"\with { } \with { }
and have ViolinI and ViolinII available.
> So I will try to integrate the context-id -
> perhaps context-name will be optional and one can choose between a
> counter and a context-id.
Of course that would be a very nice feature, too :)
> I am still on a trip, where we sing Arnold Schönbergs "Friede auf
> Erden", a piece from "Jaakko Mäntyjärvy" and some more. Great music :)
> But I hope to get back to work on this in about 2 weeks.
Have a great time! I'm looking forward to lalily/editionEngraver updates :)
best,
Janek
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
