"Br. Samuel Springuel" <rpspring...@gmail.com> writes: > On 2014-07-18 4:37 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >> It does not appear like you used the -drelative-includes option, did >> you? > > If by this you mean putting #(ly:set-option 'relative-includes #t) at > the top of the lilypond files, then yes, I did try this option and it > makes no difference. > > If you mean that there is a command line option for lilypond-book that > I should be invoking, then there's a typo in your email as > lilypond-book doesn't recognize the option -drelative-includes. Are > you referring to some variant of the --include option?
No, I was indeed confusing lilypond and lilypond-book here. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user