People,
After being bitten (unnecessarily) by old code in the LSR and having a
continuing argument with David about how it came about - I have to ask -
is there any reason why all the snippets in the LSR can't be
automatically updated when a new version is introduced? Surely this
would not be hard to do? If the Guile syntax is changing so often, what
is the point of keeping old code in the LSR? It is fair enough to tell
people that they have to convert THEIR OWN code but the people who run
the LSR, repo should be responsible for keeping that up to date . .
If there is an argument for keeping a snippet in it's original form
because of historical significance or something - an archive could be
kept of it.
Just my 2c . .
Regards,
Phil.
--
Philip Rhoades
GPO Box 3411
Sydney NSW 2001
Australia
E-mail: p...@pricom.com.au
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
