Federico Bruni <fedelogy <at> gmail.com> writes: > 4. Web interface > Currently the contributions are handled via github or by email. > Github is a good way but it's for geeks only. There are currently only seven contributors: > > https://github.com/chrissawer/The-Mutopia-Project/graphs/contributors The github is not mentioned on the mutopiaproject contributions page. Pointing to that page might reassure contributors that the project is alive and well. I contribute via email.
When I am learning a public-domain piece of music I look for a source on MutopiaProject. Published music often has impossible page-breaks, and revising a LilyPond source is more rewarding than cutting up the paper score. Updating old scores is usually a matter of convert-ly followed by removal of typically very many \overrides that are no longer needed. I wish there was a side-by-side diff for this one: https://github.com/chrissawer/The-Mutopia-Project/ commit/81a588f5d16a3bcb4110bd1e8197dbdc5a08137e Just say 'no' to Scheme. I put just one scheme function, copied from the manual, into a mutopiaproject contribution, and that caused problems almost immediately. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-11/msg00201.html _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user