I agree entirely with James that the input looks good as is. Only
tangentially related, does the placement of the first mark bother anyone
else? I feel like it would look better after rather than over the clef.
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 9:42 PM, James Harkins <jamshar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> James Harkins <jamshark70 <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> > FWIW, I agree with Kieren. If I saw a part with some multimeasure rests
> > broken for no obvious reason, e.g.
> >
> > { \compressFullBarRests \mark \default R1*2 R1*2 \mark \default R1*2 }
> >
> > I would think the publisher was insane or incompetent. I'm surprised
> this is
> > LP's default behavior.
>
> Hm, no, that example looks OK because of the older-style rest format.
>
> *This* looks nuts to me, and I don't recall every seeing anything like this
> in any part that I played from in wind bands in high school and college...
> why not just |--- 4 ---|?
>
> { \compressFullBarRests \override MultiMeasureRest #'expand-limit = #1
> \mark
> \default R1*2 R1*2 \mark \default R1*2 }
>
> hjh
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
