Eluze, Thank you for your reply and the instructions. The length of the code was to demonstrate the inconsistencies, i.e., nine separate instances produce randomly two different results. Why is it that the code presented in the manual ( and copied in my exampled ) does not produce in my work the same as is in the manual?
Mark -----Original Message----- From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr....@gnu.org [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr....@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Eluze Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 4:28 PM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: delayed turn Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote > > As an example of the inconsistency, one measure was repeated 9 times - > see turn.ly and turn.pdf. The turn should be between the c8. and the > d16 . All turns should be under the slur. > > > > What should I change? please always reduce your code to minimal! the following code should help to get the expected result: \new Staff { \time 2/4 \relative c'' { \override Fingering #'avoid-slur = #'inside \override Fingering #'outside-staff-priority = #16 \override Slur #'outside-staff-priority = #666 \override TextScript #'avoid-slur = #'inside \override TextScript #'outside-staff-priority = #15 \repeat unfold 9 { c8. ( ^hello -3 d16-2 es f g es-2 ) } } } sometimes it's not enough to say /#'avoid-slur = #'inside/ because other items have a higher or lower priority and can interfere! Eluze -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/delayed-turn-tp156135p156145.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
