TaoCG <tao_lilypondu...@gmx.net> writes: > David Kastrup wrote >> TaoCG < > >> tao_lilyponduser@ > >> > writes: >> >>> David Kastrup wrote >>>> >>>> Again, it is totally unclear what you want to be your input and your >>>> output. >>> >>> If my message reached you like this then indeed it is. >>> On my side, via the nabble web interface, it looks fine though. >> >> Web interfaces are somewhat treacherous. Gmane.org seems to be more >> reliable. >> >>> I'll just post a screenshot and try to make it clearer..... >>> >>> 2013-12-13_154458.png >>> <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n155723/2013-12-13_154458.png> >>> >> >> Well, an afterthought: you could probably define uppercase letters to be >> a quartertone (or less) sharp, and then postprocess your music, turning >> all of those back to normal pitch and adding the top octave. >> >> If you do the unsharpening/octavation in the toplevel-music-functions >> hook, it will actually happen at a time when all \relative music has >> already been turned into absolute music, so that would not interfere. > > That's an interesting idea, I'll definitely try it, thanks! > What exactly do you mean by toplevel? Are these functions defined or applied > differently than regular music functions?
toplevel-music-functions is a central hook containing a list of Scheme functions that are applied when scorify-music is called. I think the arguments they receive is the parser and music, and they return music again. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
