2013/12/9 Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org>: > Hi, > > I have a few questions about the contents of the "Easier editing" page on > lilypond.org. > > a) > LilyPondTool. > The link is broken, and http://lilypondtool.blogspot.de/ states (as of > 2012-09-14) that development of LilyPondTool is stopped. > Should I move it to the " Other programs not being actively developed" > section?
absolutely! > b) > What is the reason that Tunefl is the topmost item in this list > Shouldn't we instead add a new subsection for Online tools? > - Tunefl > - Schikker's list > - lilybin > - more? > I would even add the MediaWiki extension to Wikipedia there. Hard to say. And I think there was some licensing problem with Lilybin (it may not be fully free, and as GNU we cannot recommend non-free programs). But i agree that Frescobaldi should be on top, then Denemo, and then Tunefl (as it does allow only to create small scores). Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
