David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> schrieb:
>
>We need to figure out how we can provide "style sheets", similar to how
>LaTeX makes it possible to define "document classes" (layout
>definitions
>and tools) and "packages" (raw functionality packaged into coherent
>interfaces).
>
>Moving in the direction where this is possible also takes some pressure
>of stable/unstable development and features/fixes: something which
>comes
>in its own, optionally used file is not disruptive to the core
>stability.
>
You can imagine that I like this idea ;-)
Would also make it more straightforward for editors to implement functionality
based on LilyPond or Scheme code that's not part of LilyPond itself.
Is this just a thought or has there already been discussion about this?
Urs
>--
>David Kastrup
>
>_______________________________________________
>lilypond-user mailing list
>lilypond-user@gnu.org
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
