On 30/11/13 21:40, David Kastrup wrote:
The backend is much less coherent, so expertise is harder to acquire, people tend to work with partial knowledge, and progress is a lot more fragile. We need to get those four months down, and yes, a shouting match is not going to help. What will help is refactoring and rearchitecturing, and that needs people with a thorough programming background.
Is it perhaps worthwhile having a purely "backend cycle" where _all_ development effort is focused on turning the backend into something that's easy to work with?
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
