Hi all, > The number we want to be talking about is maybe a tweak every few pages. > A friendly tweaking tool is still nice for that, but it's not as > important than when you are doing a hundred tweaks per page. > > But if we are talking about a hundred tweaks per page, it is extremely > unlikely that those tweaks are _not_ dealing with systematic problems, > and dealing with systematic problems is something that the computer does > with a lot less effort and boredom and tie-in than a human in the long run.
So the sweet spot is the convergence point of optimally-intelligent automatic/“systematic” algorithms and an optimally-user-friendly tweaking system… Sounds dead simple to implement… ;) Cheers, Kieren. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
