I think Finale 2011 is a good start. Anyway if one user (you) would enter examples with Fin 2011 it might be easier to find someone simply opening it with 2013 or 2014.
I wwould add any notation program anyone would come up with of course. Peter Bjuhr <peterbj...@gmail.com> schrieb: >> Janek is somewhat disappointed by aspects of LilyPond's performance, >> and I have the idea it would be good to put him (and his readers) in >> the right perspective by having some actual comparisons. While I have > >> to admit he's right with his criticisms I assume in some (or all) >> aspects other tools would have failed completely >> And as I'm not happy with this unbacked assumption I would like to >> have some volunteers willing to engrave a few complex examples with >> Finale and Sibelius (up-to-date versions and sufficient experience >> required). > >I would like to volunteer for this, because it sounds important. But I >only have Finale 2011. I used to upgrade to every other Finale version. > >But after I moved to LilyPond I have had no plans of upgrading! > >Maybe you could/should add also MuseScore to this (I've seen some >testimonies of people moving from LilyPond to MuseScore), then I would >have easier to work with the latest version!? > >Best >Peter > > >_______________________________________________ >lilypond-user mailing list >lilypond-user@gnu.org >https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
