I think Finale 2011 is a good start. Anyway if one user (you) would enter 
examples with Fin 2011 it might be easier to find someone simply opening it 
with 2013 or 2014.

I wwould add any notation program anyone would come up with of course.



Peter Bjuhr <peterbj...@gmail.com> schrieb:
>> Janek is somewhat disappointed by aspects of LilyPond's performance, 
>> and I have the idea it would be good to put him (and his readers) in 
>> the right perspective by having some actual comparisons. While I have
>
>> to admit he's right with his criticisms I assume in some (or all) 
>> aspects other tools would have failed completely
>> And as I'm not happy with this unbacked assumption I would like to 
>> have some volunteers willing to engrave a few complex examples with 
>> Finale and Sibelius (up-to-date versions and sufficient experience 
>> required). 
>
>I would like to volunteer for this, because it sounds important. But I 
>only have Finale 2011. I used to upgrade to every other Finale version.
>
>But after I moved to LilyPond I have had no plans of upgrading!
>
>Maybe you could/should add also MuseScore to this (I've seen some 
>testimonies of people moving from LilyPond to MuseScore), then I would 
>have easier to work with the latest version!?
>
>Best
>Peter
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>lilypond-user mailing list
>lilypond-user@gnu.org
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to