I think there is one thing the mailing list can't really offer compared to a Q&A site: accepted answers. This is really a good thing. But definitely no reason to spread our forceds and competence. Ther already _are_ places to present solutions, although not as answersx to posted questions: the LSR and - for solutions requiring newer LP versions - the Github repository. For topics that benefit from a tutorial-like explanation we have the blog with its (still very much empty) faq category.
So I would vote for either doing nothing or setting up a landing page which directs to the proper place (i.e. the list) Urs Gilberto Agostinho <gilbertohasn...@gmail.com> schrieb: >Hmm, after reading all arguments against a Stack Exchange page, I have >to >say I completely changed my opinion on this regards as well. Indeed it >would >not be good for us to spread a small community in two places, and >re-posting >questions on both would be a waste of time indeed. My first reaction on >this >idea was simply "how cool, more places to discuss LilyPond, this might >bring >even more people on board!", but now I see it is really not that >simple. > >And no David, there is absolutely nothing wrong with this mailing-list >:) > >Regards to all, >Gilberto > > > >-- >View this message in context: >http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Thoughts-about-creating-Stack-Exchange-page-tp153215p153253.html >Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >_______________________________________________ >lilypond-user mailing list >lilypond-user@gnu.org >https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user