I think there is one thing the mailing list can't really offer compared to a 
Q&A site: accepted answers. This is really a good thing. But definitely no 
reason to spread our forceds and competence.
Ther already _are_ places to present solutions, although not as answersx to 
posted questions: the LSR and - for solutions requiring newer LP versions - the 
Github repository. For topics that benefit from a tutorial-like explanation we 
have the blog with its (still very much empty) faq category.

So I would vote for either doing nothing or setting up a landing page which 
directs to the proper place (i.e. the list)

Urs



Gilberto Agostinho <gilbertohasn...@gmail.com> schrieb:
>Hmm, after  reading all arguments against a Stack Exchange page, I have
>to
>say I completely changed my opinion on this regards as well. Indeed it
>would
>not be good for us to spread a small community in two places, and
>re-posting
>questions on both would be a waste of time indeed. My first reaction on
>this
>idea was simply "how cool, more places to discuss LilyPond, this might
>bring
>even more people on board!", but now I see it is really not that
>simple.
>
>And no David, there is absolutely nothing wrong with this mailing-list
>:)
>
>Regards to all,
>Gilberto
>
>
>
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Thoughts-about-creating-Stack-Exchange-page-tp153215p153253.html
>Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>_______________________________________________
>lilypond-user mailing list
>lilypond-user@gnu.org
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to