Thanks, yes that makes sense from a fret number point of view.
Unfortunately from a violinist/fiddler point of view, the semitone notation
does no good.

For example, on a violin, in the simplest 1st position:
 (2nd string) A string:  A open, Bb/B 1st finger, C/C# 2nd finger, D 3rd
finger, E 4th finger or open E string

(3rd string) D string: D open, Eb/E 1st finger, F/F# 2nd finger, G/G# 3rd
finger, A 4th or open A

So in first position on violin, "frets 1/2" are 1st finger, "frets 3/4" are
2nd finger, "frets 5/6" are 3rd finger.
I don't think fiddle players would want to bother trying to make this
translation in their head while playing.

It would be great for fiddle players and fiddle tunes, to have a tab for
fingering.
I don't think the semitone notation will do any good for violin playing in
tab.

Let me know if there is a way in Lilypond for tab fingering in this case.
Otherwise I'm not sure it's worth having the tab for violin/fiddle,
Thanks




On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:18 AM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:

> "R.D. Latimer" <rdlati...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I'd like help getting started with transcribing fiddle tunes with music
> and
> > tab.
> >
> > Here's my initial try (first two measures)
> > The fingering for the violin is not correct in the tab. Fingering should
> be:
> > 2 0 0  2 0 0 | 3 1 1  3 0 1 |
>
> That's a misunderstanding what a tab shows.  The tab does not show
> fingerings but rather positions.  And it counts those positions in
> "frets", namely semitones.  As far as I can see, the results are quite
> correct.
>
> Now I haven't ever used tablature for violin, and I definitely agree
> that the numbers seem to increase ridiculously fast as a violinist would
> likely think more in wholetone positions rather than semitone positions:
>
> Playing "in third position" to a violinist means playing a major or
> minor third above playing "in first position" when using the same
> fingering.  It may be different for players of violoncello or double
> bass.  Or fretted instruments like a viol.
>
> So at any rate, the TAB delivers the _full_ information you need for
> playing the melody.  I'm not sure how it could do so when only using a
> wholetone numbering system.
>
> Most relevantly, the TAB looks like expected by the _programmers_.  Do
> you have any printed examples that would help the programmers to
> understand how it should look like in order to meet _your_ expectations?
>
> --
> David Kastrup
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to