Well David, thanks for your answers and opinions. Even though I really respect your views (and you certainly know infinitely more about LilyPond and programming than I do), I still think I am right on this one. I personally see the lack of slashes on beamed grace notes + the lack of automatic beaming for grouped grace notes as major drawbacks with LilyPond. Certainly the second problem can be overcame by the use of [], but I find it annoying, non standard and easily overseen when dealing with a large score. All other engraving software I have used behave in the way I am proposing, so I don't think I am speaking of something that exotic here.
But still I certainly understand and agree with you that compatibility problem is a big issue here, and due to lack of programming knowledge I better be quiet about proposing any sort of solution (sorry for the clumsy propositions on the previous message(s)). Anyway, I really don't see much point in dragging this discussion further to be honest. Thanks for all the answers and take care! Gilberto -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Acciaccaturas-and-slashed-stems-tp150981p151051.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
