2013/9/16 Janek Warchoł <janek.lilyp...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > 2013/9/15 Alan McConnell <a...@his.com>: >> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 07:23:06PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >>> >>> > special needs or interest have Bach Dover scores? But I >>> > would expect tho folks who do have such scores to easily >>> > recognize my problem from the "extract" that I gave, and >>> > reproduce above. >>> >>> Some piece of LilyPond code that does not compile, and that even if it >>> did compile were missing what you want to see? >> >> I thought my "extract" was "sight-readable", for anyone >> who had even a passing acquaintance with writing >> Lilypont .lys. > > ah, but sight-reading doesn't have anything to do with this. After > reading (tens of) thousands of LilyPond emails, we (or at least I) > have developed a habit (actually sort of a 'conditioned response') of > grabbing the code from an email, pasting it into an editor and running > lilypond on that file. if the compilation fails, our brains say "no > output to view, nothing to do. continue to next email" (regardless of > what's in the actual code) and that's it.
I have to say: I tend more and more in the same direction. Cheers, Harm > > So, even though i can read lilypond code pretty well, my brain doesn't > want to. it wants to view an image. > > cheers, > janek > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
