MarcM wrote > If we compare slurs in original scores. We can see that when the second > note included in the slur is going up, the end point of the slur ends on a > south west point. <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n148490/slurs_in_score_from_1910_UP.png> > > When the interval goes down, the end point of the slur ends on a south > east point of the note. <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n148490/slurs_in_score_from_1910_DOWN.png> > > Slurs in lilypond are pretty close when the internal is going up. However > when the interval is going down, the end point is such that the slur > appears to miss the note: <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n148490/slurs_in_lilypond.png> > > > I was initially going to tweak the slur but we should not have to do that > for every slur going down.
I think there are lots of styles to attach slurs to noteheads or stems and I don't know of valid rules. where is your example from? I know other scores where slurs look quite different. if you like you can specify or propose a new style as a feature request. Eluze -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Slurs-end-point-need-to-be-different-when-going-up-down-tp148490p148534.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
