Hi Urs,
> No, these don't, but I think that fingerings in itself _do_ belong in there,
> and if the original ones from Henle are copyrighted ...
This is my vision.
1. Each of the following hierarchically inherits from (i.e., includes) the one
above:
Lilypond.ily
Score.ily
PianoStaff.ily
Lilypond_piano_solo.ily
Lilypond_piano_solo_letter.ily, Lilypond_piano_solo_A4.ily,
Lilypond_piano_solo_letter_landscape.ily, …
This would be the point at which the default Lilypond user would \include a
"house style" (e.g., Lilypond_piano_solo_letter.ily) to engrave their basic
piano solo parts.
Then we'd have
Henle_piano_concert.ily
or some such name. This would be in place of Lilypond_piano_solo_letter.ily
(etc.), and would be included if you wanted that "Henle Beethoven urtext" look.
Finally, we have
Beethoven_Op10No3_manuscript.ily
Henle_Beethoven_Op10No3_Winter19751976_editorials.ily
and you'd have a file
Henle_Beethoven_Op10No3_Winter19751976.ly
\include Henle_piano_concert.ily
\include Beethoven_Op10No3_manuscript.ily
\include Henle_Beethoven_Op10No3_Winter19751976_editorials.ily
Yes?
So fingerings (which are NOT in the manuscript, as far as I know) would be
included in Henle_Beethoven_Op10No3_Winter19751976_editorials.ily only, not the
main stylesheet (Henle_piano_concert.ily).
Of course, in order to make the main stylesheet as good as possible, we need to
have fingerings in there (via the \include structure I've outlined above), so
that we can tweak everything accordingly. To avoid the copyright problem, I
would do this (which, ultimately, is a superior structure anyway):
Henle_Beethoven_Op10No3_Winter19751976.ly
\include Henle_piano_concert.ily
\include Beethoven_Op10No3_manuscript.ily
\include Henle_Beethoven_Op10No3_Kieren_editorials.ily
Right?
Thanks,
Kieren.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
