Hi Urs,
> I don't know if it's the _best_ and _most flexible_ structure, but it
> definitely looks like a _good_ and _flexible_ structure.
I probably can't ask for any more at this stage. ;)
> (Just one question: Why is 6. named as it is?)
Good question. I guess I'm thinking of a situation where one wants to restyle a
certain piece of 'piano' (the "top level") music:
Berceuse_Henle_concert.ly
\include Berceuse_notes.ily
\include piano_Henle_concert.ily
Berceuse_Barenreiter_letter_landscape.ly
\include Berceuse_notes.ily
\include piano_Barenreiter_letter_landscape.ily
Somehow that hierarchy seemed more logical. Thoughts?
Thanks,
Kieren.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
